Skip to main content

Fluorescent Proteins: FRET


Förster (or Fluorescence) Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) is a process by which energy is non-radiatively transferred from an excited donor fluorophore to an acceptor. Because this process is extremely sensitive to the distance between the fluorophores at the single-nanometer scale, scientists can use FRET to report on protein binding or conformational changes. Organic dyes, fluorescent proteins, and other molecules have been demonstrated for use in FRET experiments.

FRET efficiency can be measured using fluorescence microscopy or spectroscopy by exciting the donor and detecting the emission of the acceptor. Alternatively, the fluorescence lifetime (the time between excitation of the fluorophore and emission of a photon) of the donor can be measured using fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) or FLIM-FRET, where the increased energy transfer through FRET reduces the donor lifetime. FRET is often used to study (1) protein-protein interactions where each protein is separately fused to a donor or acceptor molecule (also referred to as intermolecular or bimolecular FRET) or (2) conformational changes within a protein where the donor and acceptor are both fused to the same protein (also referred to as intramolecular or unimolecular FRET).

Learn more about FRET on our blog and explore the tables below for plasmids and information to help plan your next FRET experiment.

Looking for FRET-based biosensors? Check out our Biosensors Collection to find fluorescent biosensors targeting metal ions, small molecules, and more.

Popular FRET Pairs

This table lists some popular fluorescent proteins used as FRET pairs along with their properties. Where available, we have listed cloning backbones and control plasmids.

Donor Acceptor λDex QYD λAem εA QYA R0 J(λ) Plasmids
mTagBFP sfGFP 399 0.64 510 83,000 0.65 4.6 2.6 mTagBFP2-pBAD, sfGFP-pBAD
ECFP EYFP 434 0.41 527 67,000 0.67 4.8 1.5 pmECFP-1, pmEYFP-1, pECFP18aaEYFP
mCerulean mVenus 433 0.49 527 104,000 0.64 5.3 2.3 mCerulean N1, mVenus N1
mTurquoise2 mVenus 434 0.93 527 104,000 0.64 5.9 2.3 pmTurquoise2-N1, mVenus N1, pmVenus(L68V)-mTurquoise2
mTurquoise2 mNeonGreen 434 0.93 517 116,000 0.8 6.2 3.1 pmTurquoise2-N1, pCS2+mNeonGreen-C Cloning Vector, mNeonGreen-mTurquoise2
CyPet YPet 435 0.51 530 104,000 0.77 5.3 2.3 CYPet-N1, YPet-N1
mTFP1 mVenus 462 0.85 527 104,000 0.64 6.0 2.9 mTFP1-N1, mVenus N1
mTFP1 mCitrine 462 0.85 529 94,000 0.74 5.9 2.6 mTFP1-N1, mCitrine-pBAD
EGFP mCherry 488 0.60 610 72,000 0.22 5.3 1.9 mEGFP-N1, mCherry2-N1, pcDNA3.1 CMV mCherry-eGFP BGH
Clover mRuby2 505 0.76 600 113,000 0.38 6.3 4.5 pcDNA3-Clover, pcDNA3-mRuby2, pcDNA3.1-Clover-mRuby2
mClover3 mRuby3 506 0.78 592 128,000 0.45 6.4 4.9 pNCS-mClover3, pNCS-mRuby3, pKanCMV-mClover3-mRuby3
mNeonGreen mRuby3 506 0.80 592 128,000 0.45 6.4 4.7 pCS2+mNeonGreen-C Cloning Vector, pcDNA3-mRuby2, mNeonGreen-mRuby2-FRET-10
SYFP2 mScarlet3 515 0.68 592 104,000 0.75 6.3 4.8 pSYFP2-C1, pmScarlet3_C1, pDx_mScarlet3-SYFP2
mVenus mKO2 515 0.64 565 63,800 0.62 5.7 2.9 mVenus N1, mKO2-N1
mOrange2 mCherry 549 0.60 610 72,000 0.22 6.1 4.4 mOrange2-N1, mCherry2-N1
miRFP670 miRFP720 642 0.14 720 87,400 0.061 5.7 13 pmiRFP670-N1, pmiRFP720-N1
LSSmOrange* mKate2 437 0.45 633 62,500 0.40 5.6 3.7 pLSSmOrange-N1, mKate1.31-pBAD, pLSSmOrange-mKate2
LSSmOrange* mScarlet3 437 0.45 592 104,000 0.75 5.8 4.3 pLSSmOrange-N1, pmScarlet3_C1
mT-Sapphire* tdTomato 399 0.6 581 138,000 0.69 6.4 5.9 mT-Sapphire-N1, tdTomato-N1
CyOFP1* mCardinal 497 0.76 659 87,000 0.19 6.7 6.5 pNCS-CyOFP, mCardinal-N1
mAmetrine* tdTomato 406 0.58 581 138,000 0.69 6.5 7.1 mAmetrine-N1, tdTomato-N1
mTurquoise2 sREACh** (super-REACh, aka Nữ) 434 0.93 531** 115,000 0.07 6.1 3.0 pmTurquoise2-N1, sREACh-C1, sReach-mTurquoise2
EGFP sREACh** (super-REACh, aka Nữ) 488 0.60 531** 115,000 0.07 6.0 4.1 mEGFP-N1, sREACh-C1, mGFP-10-sREACh-N3
EGFP ShadowY** 488 0.6 531** 136,000 0.01 6.1 4.5 mEGFP-N1, CMV-ShadowY, EGFP-ShadowY

λDex: Donor maximum excitation wavelength (nm), QYD: Donor quantum yield, λAem: Acceptor maximum emission wavelength (nm), εA: Acceptor exctinction coefficient (M-1 cm-1), QYA: Acceptor quantum yield, R0: Förster Radius (nm, distance at which 50% FRET efficiency occurs), J(λ): Overlap integral of the donor emission and acceptor excitation spectra (×1015 M-1 cm-1 nm4). Values obtained from FPbase.org FRET calculator (Link opens in a new window)

*: Long Stokes shift donor

**: Non-fluorescent (dark) acceptor, used for FLIM measurements

Note that FRET measurements can be influenced by many factors, such as the organism or cell type, relative position and orientation of the fluorophores through linkers, fluorescent protein expression level and maturation time, and other environmental factors. When designing your experiment, be sure to refer to published reports and include appropriate controls to help interpret your results. See Algar et al. (2019) (Link opens in a new window) for more detailed discussion.

FRET Calibration Standards

The articles or collections listed below feature plasmids with positive and negative FRET controls or calibration standards consisting of donor and acceptor proteins fused with linkers of varying lengths.

Description Article
ECFP-EYFP FRET standards, fusion proteins with linkers of varying length Evers et al. (2006) Quantitative understanding of the energy transfer between fluorescent proteins connected via flexible peptide linkers
mCerulean, mVenus, and Amber (mVenus Y67C) FRET standards and cloning backbones Koushik et al. (2006) Cerulean, Venus, and VenusY67C FRET reference standards
mCerulean-mVenus FRET efficiency standards Thaler et al. (2005) Quantitative multiphoton spectral imaging and its use for measuring resonance energy transfer
mCerulean, mVenus, and Amber (mVenus Y67C) constructs for measuring energy transfer to multiple acceptors Koushik et al. (2009) Anomalous surplus energy transfer observed with multiple FRET acceptors
mTurquoise2-mVenus FRET calibration standards and fusion proteins Feldmann et al. (2023) Protocol for deriving proximity, affinity, and stoichiometry of protein interactions using image-based quantitative two-hybrid FRET
Positive and negative controls and cloning backbones for mTurquoise2-mVenus(L68V) Goedhart et al. (2012) Structure-guided evolution of cyan fluorescent proteins towards a quantum yield of 93%
Positive and negative controls and cloning backbones for various FRET pairs with mTurquoise2 Mastop et al. (2017) Characterization of a spectrally diverse set of fluorescent proteins as FRET acceptors for mTurquoise2
Positive and negative controls and cloning backbones for red, yellow, and turquoise FRET pairs Gadella et al. (2023) mScarlet3: a brilliant and fast-maturing red fluorescent protein
Variety of fusion proteins, positive controls for many FRET pairs Michael Davidson Lab (Unpublished) FRET Indicators - Live and Fixed Cells

Additional Resources at Addgene

References

External Resources


Content last reviewed: 25 September 2025